14 dormitories of IIM Ahmedabad to be demolished, Riyaz Tayyibji responds

ALive! Content

ALive! Content

Riyaz Tayyibji responds to the IIM Ahmedabad's desicion to demolish some dormitories, part of the campus designed by Louis Kahn in 1962.

Categories:

Share Post:

Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on pinterest
Share on email

IIM Ahmedabad
Photograph by © Cemal Emden

Designed in 1962, IIM Ahmedabad remains as one of the most revered and celebrated works of the master architect, Louis Kahn. The administration of the IIM Ahmedabad recently announced that some of the dormitories which are the part of IIM Ahmedabad complex, are going to be demolished soon to make way for the new buildings.

This decision by IIM Ahmedabad administration has caused an outrage among many people which includes alumni, architects, urbanists, historians, conservationists and others. IIMA Director through their letter to the alumni shared a number of reasons behind this decision. The copy of the letter can be found HERE.

In a Facebook Post, Riyaz Tayyibji, architect and partner at Anthill Design, Ahmedabad, responded to the decision of IIM Ahmedabad administration to demolish the dormitories. His post mentioned the following,

It’s important to put context into perspective. To really understand the value of things, we must understand the circumstances in which they emerged, the meaning that they have held at various times as much as the meaning that they hold at present.
 
In 1960 the state of Gujarat was born. It was not a painless birth, severed from its most prosperous economic centre: Bombay, and facing a severe series of droughts and famine, including one that year. Its rate of development fell to 2.63%. These were hard strapped times. The resource-stricken country as a whole was growing at a (COVID like) 2.93% with steel and concrete in very short supply and largely being reserved for military and public infrastructure: those ‘temples of modern India’. You will remember that even a decade later, 1972, a shortage of steel would result in the first concrete space frame structure at Pragati Maidan. Necessity as the mother of invention they say. The next two decades would be ones of frugality and scarcity, and yet it is during this period that some of the most important works of architecture would be built in these most trying circumstances.
 
Frugality, scarcity and austerity would lead to an aesthetic approach that would find its own poetics. Often the life imagined in these buildings would be monastic, stripped bare, organised around absolute essentials. What then could an architect work with? The Sun? Light? Shadow? The Character of Material? the Sensuousness of Form? The Rigour of Geometry? The Sense of Weight? Gravity? Exquisite Proportion? The Generosity of Volume? In these building of tight inside spaces that reduce the total area to be built, the quality of outside spaces imagined by the architects had that ecological richness and economic simplicity. A north lawn here, a plaza there, a ramp, a canteen a ball and bat, nine nights of dancing.
 
If you were a student of architecture in the 90’s this is what you learnt from the buildings of that time, and none talked about this frugality in more ambitious, lofty and poetic terms than the Indian Institute of Management by Louis I Kahn. I remember the sense of wonder of realising that it is the ‘lowly toilet block’, that ‘servant space’, in the Louis Kahn Plaza that breaks the monotony of the six repetitive classrooms. Or the incompleteness of the square (The jury is still out on whether it’s a triangle to which stuff is added!) of the dormitory plan that allows the alternating plazas to interlock with the buildings. Each dormitory is different: each dormitory is the same. ORDER: that daunting word! That tapestry of Space and Form, Inside and Outside. Sensuousness and Rigour. Here good architecture is not a luxury, it can be achieved with the barest of resources.
 
In our consumer intensive world where the narrative of architecture has been usurped as a privilege of wealth, leisure and luxury, where projects become a showcase for the virtuoso in an orgy of material intercourse, if not masturbation, we might do well to remember a simpler time when ‘less is more’ really meant something and wasn’t a cocktail party jingle. Let us not judge this building by the excesses of our time, by the pampering that we need to ensure our over calibrated comfort. Let these building remind us of the simple pleasures of the shade, the breeze and the winter sun and god-forbid that we too may be resilient should the next earthquake, drought or famine strike, and that in that calamity we may still find the strength for poetry, art and honesty.
 
These buildings talk about honesty, not only that architectural honesty to fucking material… a goddamn deep human honesty, that optimistic honesty that believes that there is something that is ‘good’. No relativistic, subjective bullshit! Here there is ‘joy’ or as Kahn would say – ‘Wonder’. There may be many insignificant reasons to demolish these buildings: damp, efflorescence, seismic stresses… etc. etc. but if we need ‘reasons’ to keep the Kahn Dormitories: Hell! We are on the wrong track!
 
Seriously! Wrong track!
 
Below is the YouTube link to a lecture given by Brinda Somaya at CEPT University on the 28th of November. At this time it is clear that the restoration work is a success. UNESCO Award, Getty Foundation and ICOMOS officials being given the tour.
 
 
It is also clear from Somaya’s talk that:
 
a) The demonstrative project of Dorm D-15 was done in 2017, and yet she seems unaware that there are any real issues with the restoration on the 28th of November
 
In fact:
 
b) The restoration of the Hostel in her opinion is a success and she and her team are expecting to complete the remaining 17 dorms contractually, though sequentially later due to logistical issues which she states quite clearly.
 
In his letter to the IIM Alumni today the IIM Director writes:
 
“We appointed an independent structural consultant who opined that the compressive and tensile stresses in the walls exceed the limits as per the coda requirements of IS:1905-1987 and that the buildings are unsafe. Halifax bars he opined do not provide any significant increase in compressive strength. The structural consultant of the conservation architect opined that the building codes referred to by the independent consultant came later and that the engineers who were involved in the construction of the campus were preoccupied with earthquake resistant buildings as Ahmedabad and Gujarat have had significant earthquakes. They concluded that the restored buildings have adequate resistance against design based earthquakes (DBE). D15 they stated will resist moderate earthquakes with limited damage and withstand severe earthquakes with significant damage. The Library, however, will in their opinion resist moderate earthquakes without any structural damage, and severe earthquakes with minor damage.”
 
So Somaya Kalappa Consultants were to restore the Dorm, on the basis of its success the library building was to proceed and did. And yet, for the latter the consultants are being celebrated for having done a Sterling Job, won a UNESCO award etc., while the former is now being condemned as a failure, something which on the 28th of November Somaya and Kalappa don’t seem to know about. Nor do they seem to be aware about this structural second opinion and a tender notice that is to be published on the 4th of December, a week after the talk linked below.
 
c) The demonstrative restoration is of Dorm D-15, which is in the WORST condition. The logic seems sound that if the restoration is successful here, then the restoration of the other dorms are a much easier proposition. And yet the IIM Director’s letter to the IIM Alumni today says that they will keep DORM D-15, 16-18. So you keep the worst one which is restored and demolish the fourteen which are in better shape. Makes perfect sense!
 
Besides, is it being suggested that there is no retrofitting possible to make the dormitories safe!!!! Seriously!!!!?

Share your comments

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

You May Also Like

Symbiosis Hospital and Research Center (SUHRC), Lavale, Pune, by IMK Architects | Rahul Kadri

Symbiosis Hospital and Research Center (SUHRC), Lavale, Pune, by IMK Architects | Rahul Kadri

The recently completed Symbiosis University Hospital and Research Centre in Pune is currently being used by the Maharashtra government as a Covid-19 quarantine facility and hospital, contributing to the state’s fight against the pandemic. Occupying the lower slopes of a hill within Symbiosis International University’s 260-acre estate in Lavale, SUHRC is a 41,800-square-metre, 216-bed, multi-specialty hospital that represents a new and progressive face for healthcare infrastructure in India, providing state-of-the-art healthcare facilities and a research centre to enhance skill development – IMK Architects

Read More »

Symbiosis International University, Pune, IMK Architects | Rahul Kadri

Nestled atop a rocky plateau in Lavale, a small village on the outskirts of Pune, the Symbiosis International University campus creates an idyllic and vibrant learning environment. The campus, home to 1000 students, houses educational and administration functions for four faculties –– the Symbiosis Institute of Business Management, the Symbiosis Institute of Mass Communication, the Symbiosis Institute of Telecom Management and the Symbiosis Institute of Photography –– in addition to an auditorium and convention center, a library, and housing, dining, and recreational facilities for students and staff. – Rahul Kadri | IMK Architects

Read More »
National Judicial Academy, at Bhopal, by IMK Architects | Rahul Kadri

National Judicial Academy, at Bhopal, by IMK Architects | Rahul Kadri

Perched on the crest of a hill in Bhopal, India, the 28,000-sq.m National Judicial Academy is a training academy for Judges, a centre for discussion and debate on the judicial system and an institute for ongoing research on matters of the law. The campus occupies 60-acres of fissured rock-steep slopes on the hill, which was formerly used as a quarry. – IMK Architects | Rahul Kadri

Read More »
Auric Hall,District Administration Building, at Aurangabad, by IMK Architects 

Auric Hall,District Administration Building, at Aurangabad, by Rahul Kadri | IMK Architects

The recently completed Auric Hall stands tall today as a landmark for Aurangabad Industrial City (AURIC), India’s first greenfield, smart industrial city. The 16,660-square-metre building, planned as the face of the upcoming development, houses administration and commercial functions, offering spaces that strive to achieve innovation and transcend expectations. – IMK Architects

Read More »
Southeast Asian culture. an article, by NANDINI BISWAS

Architecture in the labyrinth of South Asian and  Southeast Asian culture. an article, by NANDINI BISWAS

Rapport in 1969 had stated that “The primary determinants of indigenous architecture of any  place are the culture and climate of that place.” The word culture derived from the Latin word  ‘colore’ which means to tend to the earth and mature, blend in and nurture. These are the same prerequisites we believe architecture in its entire existence should abide by and, as Frank O  Ghery had mentioned, “Architecture should speak of its time and place but yearn for timelessness”; this sheds much light on the para-importance of individuality and uniqueness of place and its impact on the people and culture.  – NANDINI BISWAS

Read More »

Subscribe to Architecture and Design Updates